At a very quick look, Israelsen says he has a portfolio and a strategy that backtests well. It would have supported a zero failure rate... with some withdrawal system, over 25-year time periods, over some past time.
Apparently they are only looking at 25-year periods, which is odd because the traditional retirement planning frame is 30 years, and there's a good case to be made for planning for a longer frame, but: (Quotations below are from YouTube automated transcript with obvious mistakes corrected).The actual portfolio is still a secret, and actively managed:Q: Can you test more than 25 years
good questions you can't do more than 25 years I I had to had to make some
hard decisions about is what we're really doing here is we're studying...My knee jerk reaction (suspicious mode) is that it doesn't have as good of a result over 30-year time periods.
Statistics: Posted by student — Tue May 07, 2024 9:01 am — Replies 2 — Views 232